AI-ECG for wearable monitoring: From arrhythmia diagnosis to early warning and multi-disease prediction

AI-ECG for wearable monitoring: From arrhythmia diagnosis to early warning and multi-disease prediction

Zhiyuan Li
1,2,*
,
Yuanyuan Tian
1,2
,
Yanrui Jin
1,2
,
Chengliang Liu
1,2
*Correspondence to: Zhiyuan Li, State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. E-mail: lzy2030@sjtu.edu.cn
BME Horiz. 2026;4:202619. 10.70401/bmeh.2026.0029
Received: April 01, 2026Accepted: June 08, 2026Published: June 08, 2026
Tips Icon
This manuscript is made available in its unedited form to allow early access to the reported findings. Further editing will be completed before final publication. As such, the content may include errors, and standard legal disclaimers are applicable.

Abstract

Wearable electrocardiography (ECG) is shifting cardiovascular monitoring from episodic in-hospital testing to continuous out-of-hospital assessment. Artificial intelligence-enabled ECG (AI-ECG) provides a new pathway for extracting clinically useful information from out-of-hospital wearable recordings. This review is organized around the wearable AI-ECG monitoring pipeline, summarizing key advances in model development, clinical application, and real-world validation, while emphasizing the special requirements that wearable scenarios impose on algorithm design and clinical translation. At present, arrhythmia screening remains the most mature applications of AI-ECG, with deep learning models achieving cardiologist-level or clinician-comparable performance in several well-defined tasks. With the growing availability of long-term continuous recordings, research is further extending from post-event recognition to pre-event warning, particularly for high-risk events such as acute atrial fibrillation and malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Related methods are evolving from traditional feature-based machine learning toward deep learning and foundation models that can exploit waveform morphology, rhythm dynamics, and long-range temporal information. Beyond rhythm disorders, AI-ECG is also being explored for structural cardiac abnormalities, metabolic disorders, and broader systemic risk prediction, suggesting a potential role for ECG as a digital biomarker platform. However, several barriers continue to limit clinical translation, including limited cross-device and cross-population generalizability, insufficient interpretability, and the lack of prospective real-world validation. Future progress will likely depend on standardized data systems, artifact-aware modeling, cross-device validation, foundation models, longitudinal risk modeling, and intelligent systems designed for clinical workflows. Overall, wearable AI-ECG is evolving from passive abnormality detection toward continuous, proactive, and personalized health risk assessment.

Keywords

Wearable ECG monitoring, AI-ECG, arrhythmia diagnosis, early warning, deep learning

References

  • 1. Chong B, Jayabaskaran J, Jauhari SM, Chan SP, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: Projections from 2025 to 2050. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025;32(11):1001-1015.
    [DOI]
  • 2. Murray CJL. The global burden of disease study at 30 years. Nat Med. 2022;28(10):2019-2026.
    [DOI]
  • 3. Taylor GJ. 150 practice ECGs: Interpretation and review. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
  • 4. Anliker U, Ward JA, Lukowicz P, Troster G, Dolveck F, Baer M, et al. AMON: A wearable multiparameter medical monitoring and alert system. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed. 2004;8(4):415-427.
    [DOI]
  • 5. Li D, Cui TR, Liu JH, Shao WC, Liu X, Chen ZK, et al. Motion-unrestricted dynamic electrocardiogram system utilizing imperceptible electronics. Nat Commun. 2025;16:3259.
    [DOI]
  • 6. Attia ZI, Harmon DM, Dugan J, Manka L, Lopez-Jimenez F, Lerman A, et al. Prospective evaluation of smartwatch-enabled detection of left ventricular dysfunction. Nat Med. 2022;28(12):2497-2503.
    [DOI]
  • 7. Siontis KC, Noseworthy PA, Attia ZI, Friedman PA. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography in cardiovascular disease management. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(7):465-478.
    [DOI]
  • 8. Zhang D, Li J, Geng S, Wang Y, Chen S, Fan S, et al. ECGomics: An open platform for AI-ECG digital biomarker discovery. 2601.15326 [Preprint]. 2026.
    [DOI]
  • 9. Elgendi M, Elkhalifa A, Alhashmi N, Aldahmani A, Aljneibi N, Alamro D, et al. Wearable ECG and PPG for anxiety detection: A translational digital medicine perspective. npj Digit Med. 2026.
    [DOI]
  • 10. Baraeinejad B, Shayan MF, Vazifeh AR, Rashidi D, Hamedani MS, Tavolinejad H, et al. Design and implementation of an ultralow-power ECG patch and smart cloud-based platform. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2022;71:1-11.
    [DOI]
  • 11. Davarmanesh P, Jabbour G, Lin Q, Tenison I, Stultz C, Alam R. Abstract 4125281: Detection of acute myocardial infarction and ischemia from lead-I ECG using deep learning. Circulation. 2024.
    [DOI]
  • 12. Han C, Song Y, Lim HS, Tae Y, Jang JH, Lee BT, et al. Automated detection of acute myocardial infarction using asynchronous electrocardiogram signals-preview of implementing artificial intelligence with multichannel electrocardiographs obtained from smartwatches: Retrospective study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e31129.
    [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 13. Guo Y, Wang H, Zhang H, Liu T, Li L, Liu L, et al. Photoplethysmography-based machine learning approaches for atrial fibrillation prediction. JACC Asia. 2021;1(3):399-408.
    [DOI]
  • 14. Ozkan H, Ozhan O, Karadana Y, Gulcu M, Macit S, Husain F. A portable wearable tele-ECG monitoring system. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2020;69(1):173-182.
    [DOI]
  • 15. Zhu W, Qiu L, Cai W, Yu J, Li D, Li W, et al. A novel method to reduce false alarms in ECG diagnostic systems: Capture and quantification of noisy signals. Physiol Meas. 2021.
    [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16. Hannun AY, Rajpurkar P, Haghpanahi M, Tison GH, Bourn C, Turakhia MP, et al. Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):65-69.
    [DOI]
  • 17. Jin Y, Li Z, Wang M, Liu J, Tian Y, Liu Y, et al. Cardiologist-level interpretable knowledge-fused deep neural network for automatic arrhythmia diagnosis. Commun Med. 2024;4:31.
    [DOI]
  • 18. Liu G, Han X, Tian L, Zhou W, Liu H. ECG quality assessment based on hand-crafted statistics and deep-learned S-transform spectrogram features. Comput Meth Programs Biomed. 2021;208:106269.
    [DOI]
  • 19. Romero FP, Piñol DC, Vázquez-Seisdedos CR. DeepFilter: An ECG baseline wander removal filter using deep learning techniques. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2021;70:102992.
    [DOI]
  • 20. Chen G, Shi T, Xie B, Zhao Z, Meng Z, Huang Y, et al. SwinDAE: Electrocardiogram quality assessment using 1D swin transformer and denoising AutoEncoder. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023;27(12):5779-5790.
    [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21. Le KH, Pham HH, Nguyen TBT, Nguyen TA, Thanh TN, Do CD. LightX3ECG: A lightweight and eXplainable deep learning system for 3-lead electrocardiogram classification. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2023;85:104963.
    [DOI]
  • 22. Wei X, Li Z, Tian Y, Wang M, Jin Y, Ding W, et al. Spatial-temporal hierarchical decoupled masked autoencoder: A self-supervised learning framework for electrocardiogram. Expert Syst Appl. 2026;298:129603.
    [DOI]
  • 23. Lai J, Tan H, Wang J, Ji L, Guo J, Han B, et al. Practical intelligent diagnostic algorithm for wearable 12-lead ECG via self-supervised learning on large-scale dataset. Nat Commun. 2023;14:3741.
    [DOI]
  • 24. Smital L, Haider CR, Vitek M, Leinveber P, Jurak P, Nemcova A, et al. Real-time quality assessment of long-term ECG signals recorded by wearables in free-living conditions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020;67(10):2721-2734.
    [DOI]
  • 25. Zhang J, Lin JL, Li XL, Wang WQ. ECG signals denoising method based on improved wavelet threshold algorithm. In: 2016 IEEE advanced information management, communicates, electronic and automation control conference (IMCEC). IEEE; 2016. p. 1779-1784. [
    [DOI]
  • 26. Wang N, Feng P, Ge Z, Zhou Y, Zhou B, Wang Z. Adversarial spatiotemporal contrastive learning for electrocardiogram signals. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2024;35(10):13845-13859.
    [DOI]
  • 27. Han H, Lian C, Zeng Z, Xu B, Zang J, Xue C. Multimodal multi-instance learning for long-term ECG classification. Knowl Based Syst. 2023;270:110555.
    [DOI]
  • 28. Zhang P, Chen Y, Lin F, Wu S, Yang X, Li Q. Semi-supervised learning for automatic atrial fibrillation detection in 24-hour holter monitoring. IEEE J Biomed Heal Inform. 2022;26(8):3791-3801.
    [DOI]
  • 29. Ismail H, Serhani MA, Hussein NM, Elhadef M. RL-ECGNet: Resource-aware multi-class detection of arrhythmia through reinforcement learning. Appl Intell. 2023;53(24):30927-30939.
    [DOI]
  • 30. Tian Y, Li Z, Jin Y, Wang M, Wei X, Zhao L, et al. Foundation model of ECG diagnosis: Diagnostics and explanations of any form and rhythm on ECG. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(12):101875.
    [DOI]
  • 31. Liu J, Li Z, Jin Y, Liu Y, Liu C, Zhao L, et al. A review of arrhythmia detection based on electrocardiogram with artificial intelligence. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022;19(7):549-560.
    [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32. Wagner P, Strodthoff N, Bousseljot RD, Kreiseler D, Lunze FI, Samek W, et al. PTB-XL, a large publicly available electrocardiography dataset. Sci Data. 2020;7:154.
    [DOI]
  • 33. Martis RJ, Acharya UR, Min LC. ECG beat classification using PCA, LDA, ICA and Discrete Wavelet Transform. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2013;8(5):437-448.
    [DOI]
  • 34. Wei X, Li Z, Tian Y, Wang M, Liu J, Jin Y, et al. Differentiated knowledge distillation: Patient-specific single-sample personalization for electrocardiogram diagnostic models. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2024;136:108880.
    [DOI]
  • 35. Vaid A, Sharma J, Jiang J, Lampert J, Sawant A, Argulian E, et al. Automated diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using deep learning applied to electrocardiograms. EBioMedicine. 2026;123:106066.
    [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 36. Satija U, Ramkumar B, Manikandan MS. A review of signal processing techniques for electrocardiogram signal quality assessment. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2018;11:36-52.
    [DOI]
  • 37. Tripathi PM, Kumar A, Komaragiri R, Kumar M. A review on computational methods for denoising and detecting ECG signals to detect cardiovascular diseases. Arch Comput Meth Eng. 2022;29(3):1875-1914.
    [DOI]
  • 38. Hu L, Cai W, Chen Z, Wang M. A lightweight U-Net model for denoising and noise localization of ECG signals. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2024;88:105504.
    [DOI]
  • 39. Jin Y, Qin C, Liu J, Liu Y, Li Z, Liu C. A novel deep wavelet convolutional neural network for actual ECG signal denoising. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2024;87:105480.
    [DOI]
  • 40. Wang X, Chen B, Zeng M, Wang Y, Liu H, Liu R, et al. An ECG signal denoising method using conditional generative adversarial net. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022;26(7):2929-2940.
    [DOI]
  • 41. Li H, Ditzler G, Roveda J, Li A. DeScoD-ECG: Deep score-based diffusion model for ECG baseline wander and noise removal. IEEE J Biomed Heal Inform. 2024;28(9):5081-5091.
    [DOI]
  • 42. Sun Z, Wang C, Tian E, Yin Z. ECG signal classification via combining hand-engineered features with deep neural network features. Multimed Tools Appl. 2022;81(10):13467-13488.
    [DOI]
  • 43. Elhaj FA, Salim N, Harris AR, Swee TT, Ahmed T. Arrhythmia recognition and classification using combined linear and nonlinear features of ECG signals. Comput Meth Programs Biomed. 2016;127:52-63.
    [DOI]
  • 44. Li Q, Rajagopalan C, Clifford GD. Ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia classification using a machine learning approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(6):1607-1613.
    [DOI]
  • 45. Melgani F, Bazi Y. Classification of electrocardiogram signals with support vector machines and particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008;12(5):667-677.
    [DOI]
  • 46. Arpitha Y, Madhumathi GL, Balaji N. Spectrogram analysis of ECG signal and classification efficiency using MFCC feature extraction technique. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2022;13(2):757-767.
    [DOI]
  • 47. Yao Q, Wang R, Fan X, Liu J, Li Y. Multi-class Arrhythmia detection from 12-lead varied-length ECG using Attention-based Time-Incremental Convolutional Neural Network. Inf Fusion. 2020;53:174-182.
    [DOI]
  • 48. Jin Y, Li Z, Tian Y, Wei X, Liu C. A self-supervised framework for computer-aided arrhythmia diagnosis. Appl Soft Comput. 2024;164:112024.
    [DOI]
  • 49. Nolin-Lapalme A, Mila—Québec AI Institute Montreal Quebec HS H, Sowa A, et al. Foundation models for electrocardiogram interpretation: Clinical implications. Eur Heart J. 2026;47(18):2174-2186.
    [DOI]
  • 50. Liu R, Bai Y, Yue X, Zhang P. Teaching multimodal LLMs to comprehend 12-lead electrocardiographic images. npj Digit Med. 2026;9:349.
    [DOI]
  • 51. Liu N, Sun M, Wang L, Zhou W, Dang H, Zhou X. A support vector machine approach for AF classification from a short single-lead ECG recording. Physiol Meas. 2018;39(6):064004.
    [DOI]
  • 52. Yang S, Lian C, Zeng Z, Xu B, Zang J, Zhang Z. A multi-view multi-scale neural network for multi-label ECG classification. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell. 2023;7(3):648-660.
    [DOI]
  • 53. Jin Y, Li Z, Tian Y, Wei X, Liu C. A novel interpretable multilevel wavelet decomposition deep network for actual heartbeat classification. Sci China Technol Sci. 2024;67(6):1842-1854.
    [DOI]
  • 54. Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(20):1909-1917.
    [DOI]
  • 55. Li Z, Jin Y, Tian Y, Liu J, Wang M, Wei X, et al. M-XAF: Medical explainable diagnosis system of atrial fibrillation based on medical knowledge and semantic representation fusion. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2024;136:108890.
    [DOI]
  • 56. Zhu H, Cheng C, Yin H, Li X, Zuo P, Ding J, et al. Automatic multilabel electrocardiogram diagnosis of heart rhythm or conduction abnormalities with deep learning: A cohort study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(7):e348-e357.
    [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 57. Ribeiro AH, Ribeiro MH, Paixão GMM, Oliveira DM, Gomes PR, Canazart JA, et al. Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural network. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1760.
    [DOI]
  • 58. Sangha V, Mortazavi BJ, Haimovich AD, Ribeiro AH, Brandt CA, Jacoby DL, et al. Automated multilabel diagnosis on electrocardiographic images and signals. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1583.
    [DOI]
  • 59. Ayano YM, Schwenker F, Dufera BD, Debelee TG. Interpretable machine learning techniques in ECG-based heart disease classification: A systematic review. Diagnostics. 2023;13(1):111.
    [DOI]
  • 60. Holzinger A, Biemann C, Pattichis CS, Kell DB. What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?: arXiv:1712.09923 [Preprint]. 2017.
    [DOI]
  • 61. Yisimitila T, Wang C, Hou M, Maimaitiniyazi M, Aili Z, Liu T, et al. Bridging clinical knowledge and AI: An interpretable transformer framework for ECG diagnosis. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;9(1):41.
    [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 62. Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Asirvatham SJ, Deshmukh AJ, Gersh BJ, et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: A retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet. 2019;394(10201):861-867.
    [DOI]
  • 63. Parsi A, Glavin M, Jones E, Byrne D. Prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using new heart rate variability features. Comput Biol Med. 2021;133:104367.
    [DOI]
  • 64. Boon KH, Khalil-Hani M, Malarvili MB, Sia CW. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prediction method with shorter HRV sequences. Comput Meth Programs Biomed. 2016;134:187-196.
    [DOI]
  • 65. Tzou HA, Lin SF, Chen PS. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prediction based on morphological variant P-wave analysis with wideband ECG and deep learning. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;211:106396.
    [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 66. Gilon, Grégoire JM, Hellinckx J, Carlier S, Bersini\ H. Reproducibility of machine learning models for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation onset prediction. In: Computing in cardiology conference (CinC). Computing in Cardiology; 2022.
    [DOI]
  • 67. Boon KH, Khalil-Hani M, Malarvili MB. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prediction based on HRV analysis and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018;153:171-184.
    [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 68. Karimulla S, Patra D. A pioneering approach for early prediction of sudden cardiac death via morphological ECG features measurement and ensemble growing techniques. Comput Electr Eng. 2024;120:109740.
    [DOI]
  • 69. Loria-Romero M, Peregrina-Barreto H, Rangel-Magdaleno J, Rico-Aniles HD. Ventricular fibrillation characterization for sudden cardiac death risk prediction based on wavelet analysis. In: 2022 IEEE international symposium on medical measurements and applications (MeMeA). IEEE; 2022. p. 1-6.
    [DOI]
  • 70. Kaspal R, Alsadoon A, Prasad PWC, Al-Saiyd NA, Nguyen TQV, Pham DTH. A novel approach for early prediction of sudden cardiac death (SCD) using hybrid deep learning. Multimed Tools Appl. 2021;80(5):8063-8090.
    [DOI]
  • 71. Yang J, Sun Z, Zhu W, Xiong P, Du H, Liu X. Intelligent prediction of sudden cardiac death based on multi-domain feature fusion of heart rate variability signals. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2023;2023(1):32.
    [DOI]
  • 72. Huynh PK, Setty A, Phan H, Le TQ. Probabilistic domain-knowledge modeling of disorder pathogenesis for dynamics forecasting of acute onset. Artif Intell Med. 2021;115:102056.
    [DOI]
  • 73. Fiorina L, Carbonati T, Narayanan K, Li J, et al. Near-term prediction of sustained ventricular arrhythmias applying artificial intelligence to single-lead ambulatory electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J. 2025;46(21):1998-2008.
    [DOI]
  • 74. Gavidia M, Zhu H, Montanari AN, Fuentes J, Cheng C, Dubner S, et al. Early warning of atrial fibrillation using deep learning. Patterns. 2024;5(6):100970.
    [DOI]
  • 75. Li Z, Tian Y, Jin Y, Wei X, Wang M, Liu J, et al. An early warning method for arrhythmias in long-term ECGs based on self-supervised learning and LSTM. Knowl Based Syst. 2025;327:114137.
    [DOI]
  • 76. Li Z, Derksen H, Gryak J, Ghanbari H, Gunaratne P, Najarian K. A novel atrial fibrillation prediction algorithm applicable to recordings from portable devices. In: 2018 40th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). IEEE; 2018. p. 4034-4037. [
    [DOI]
  • 77. Grégoire JM, Gilon C, Carlier S, Bersini H. Role of the autonomic nervous system and premature atrial contractions in short-term paroxysmal atrial fibrillation forecasting: Insights from machine learning models. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;115(6-7):377-387.
    [DOI]
  • 78. Fujita H, Acharya UR, Sudarshan VK, Ghista DN, Sree SV, Eugene LWJ, et al. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) prediction based on nonlinear heart rate variability features and SCD index. Appl Soft Comput. 2016;43:510-519.
    [DOI]
  • 79. Khazaei M, Raeisi K, Goshvarpour A, Ahmadzadeh M. Early detection of sudden cardiac death using nonlinear analysis of heart rate variability. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2018;38(4):931-940.
    [DOI]
  • 80. Shi M, He H, Geng W, Wu R, Zhan C, Jin Y, et al. Early detection of sudden cardiac death by using ensemble empirical mode decomposition-based entropy and classical linear features from heart rate variability signals. Front Physiol. 2020;11:118.
    [DOI]
  • 81. Zhang Y, Cha X, Cui B, Lai D. Early recognition of sudden cardiac death combined with deep transfer learning and superficial ECG features. In: 2023 IEEE 4th international conference on pattern recognition and machine learning (PRML). IEEE; 2023. p. 294-298.
    [DOI]
  • 82. Xie CX, Wang LH, Yu YT, Ding LJ, Yang T, Kuo IC, et al. Clinical sudden cardiac death risk prediction: A grid search support vector machine multimodel base on ventricular fibrillation visualization features. Comput Electr Eng. 2025;123:110022.
    [DOI]
  • 83. Chen H, Das S, Morgan JM, Maharatna K. Prediction and classification of ventricular arrhythmia based on phase-space reconstruction and fuzzy c-means clustering. Comput Biol Med. 2022;142:105180.
    [DOI]
  • 84. Dhingra LS, Aminorroaya A, Pedroso AF, Khunte A, Sangha V, McIntyre D, et al. Artificial intelligence–enabled prediction of heart failure risk from single-lead electrocardiograms. JAMA Cardiol. 2025;10(6):574.
    [DOI]
  • 85. Sangha V, Dhingra LS, Aminorroaya A, Croon PM, Sikand NV, Sen S, et al. Identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy on electrocardiographic images with deep learning. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2025;4(8):991-1000.
    [DOI]
  • 86. Bouzid Z, Sejdic E, Martin-Gill C, Pa UP, Faramand Z, Frisch S, et al. Electrocardiogram-based machine learning for risk stratification of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2025;46(10):943-954.
    [DOI]
  • 87. Bock C, Walter JE, Rieck B, Strebel I, Rumora K, Schaefer I, et al. Enhancing the diagnosis of functionally relevant coronary artery disease with machine learning. Nat Commun. 2024;15:5034.
    [DOI]
  • 88. Poterucha TJ, Jing L, Ricart RP, Adjei-Mosi M, Finer J, Hartzel D, et al. Detecting structural heart disease from electrocardiograms using AI. Nature. 2025;644(8075):221-230.
    [DOI]
  • 89. Galloway CD, Valys AV, Shreibati JB, Treiman DL, Petterson FL, Gundotra VP, et al. Development and validation of a deep-learning model to screen for hyperkalemia from the electrocardiogram. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(5):428-436.
    [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 90. Lima EM, Ribeiro AH, Paixão GMM, Ribeiro MH, Pinto-Filho MM, Gomes PR, et al. Deep neural network-estimated electrocardiographic age as a mortality predictor. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5117.
    [DOI]
  • 91. Samek W, Montavon G, Lapuschkin S, Anders CJ, Muller KR. Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications. Proc IEEE. 2021;109(3):247-278.
    [DOI]
  • 92. Zhao W, Wu C, Fan Y, Qiu P, Zhang X, Sun Y, et al. An agentic system for rare disease diagnosis with traceable reasoning. Nature. 2026;651(8106):775-784.
    [DOI]

© The Author(s) 2026. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher’s Note

Science Exploration remains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions of the Editors or the publisher.

Share And Cite

×

Science Exploration Style
Li Z, Tian Y, Jin Y, Liu C. AI-ECG for wearable monitoring: From arrhythmia diagnosis to early warning and multi-disease prediction. BME Horiz. 2026;4:202619. https://doi.org/10.70401/bmeh.2026.0029

Submit a Manuscript
Author Instructions
Cite this Article
Export Citation
Article Metrics
0
View
0
Download
Cited
Article Updates
Citation Icon Get citation